+44 (0)20 7797 8600

MENU

 

COURT OF APPEAL REFUSES TO PUT THE (EVIDENTIAL) CART BEFORE THE (PROCEDURAL) HORSE BY ASHLEY CUKIER

Ashley Cukier discusses Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Infinity Distribution Ltd (in Administration) [2016] EWCA Civ 1014 in which the Court of Appeal makes some interesting observations about admissibility of evidence in respect of fraud, incongruity of statements and pleaded cases, and case management.

Given the increased workload of the Court of Appeal (the most recent Practice Note on hear-by dates confirms that the number of permission applications filed in the Court of Appeal has increased by 67% since 2003; whereas the number of Lord/Lady Justices of Appeal has increased by one) it is perhaps unsurprising that, in a recent case, when offered the choice of whether to reach its outcome “by a short route, or a long route”, the Court of Appeal chose the short route. It did so, however, for entirely proper reasons: a desire to ensure that, in procedural terms, the court did not “put the cart before the horse”.

Download the full article to read more

Posted: 13.12.2016 at 14:04
Tags:  Comments  Commercial Law
Share this page
Print page

Cookies help us deliver our services. By continuing to browse this website, you agree to our use of cookies. OK