+44 (0)20 7797 8600

MENU

 

WHAT MAKES A PROTECTED DISCLOSURE?: REFLECTIONS ON SIMPSON V CANTOR FITZGERALD

Jeremy Lewis and Martin Fodder, two of the authors of Whistleblowing, Law and Practice, 3rd edition 2017, Oxford University Press, (“WLP”)[1] consider the EAT’s judgment in Simpson v Cantor Fitzgerald Europe

[1] Updated by a Supplement available at http://www.littletonchambers.com/publications/books-241.

The EAT’s judgment in Simpson v Cantor Fitzgerald Europe, UKEAT/0016/18/DA, 21 June  2019 (Choudhury P) considered the application of a number of points of whistleblowing law which have recently been reviewed by the Court of Appeal and, in one case, is shortly to be reviewed by the Supreme Court. David Reade QC of Littleton appeared for the claimant/appellant, Mr Simpson. Although the decision traverses some now familiar ground on the meaning of a protected disclosure, it raises some important considerations particularly in relation to aggregating disclosures, the approach to identifying whether a query also amounts to a disclosure, and the relevance of “insider status”, not only of the claimant but also of the recipient of the disclosure, in assessing reasonable belief.

To read full article, please click here

Posted: 03.07.2019 at 11:31
Tags:  Comments  On Employment
Share this page
Print page

Cookies help us deliver our services. By continuing to browse this website, you agree to our use of cookies. OK