Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Back to all news

Pre-action correspondence and costs following discontinuance

In his monthly column in PLC, James Bickford Smith considers the Court of Appeal’s decision in Nelson’s Yard Management Company and others v Eziefula [2013] EWCA Civ 235 and how a failure to respond to pre-action correspondence can justify departure from the default rules on costs following discontinuance.

Read James’ column here.

Relevant Members
Shortlist Updated