Georgina is ranked as a Band 4 employment junior in the Legal 500 and a Band 6 employment junior in Chambers and Partners, having first entered the directories after her second year in practice, where she has been described as:
“superb,” “a junior with gravitas,” “super-bright,” “very clever and commercial” “wins cases with incredibly sharp analysis and by managing to spot the points that others miss,” “consistently excellent at advocacy,” “excellent at cross-examining,” “has excellent judgement,” “first class in remaining calm, assured and unflustered,” “inspires trust in the client very early on,” “her client-management skills are excellent,” “extremely user-friendly,” and “everything that you need in a junior barrister.”
She enjoys a busy trial, appellate, drafting and advisory practice and is deployed in complex, novel and high value litigation at first instance and on appeal both as sole counsel and as junior counsel to KC’s in High Court and Statutory Employment Litigation.
Georgina has a particular interest in City whistleblowing, pregnancy, maternity and family friendly rights disputes and restrictive covenant, inducement, unlawful means conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, misuse of confidential information and database rights claims litigated in the High Court.
She enjoys repeat instructions from loyal clients at tier 1 employment firms, frequently working with both senior executive and respondent clients in the financial services, professional services, insurance, fintech, tech, energy, recruitment, sports and media sectors.
Georgina offers her clients significant trial experience in high stakes litigation, whether as sole counsel or part of a team, having been instructed in multi week trials as sole counsel against significantly more senior counsel, in cases pleaded in excess of 7 and 8 figures, alongside acting led and unled in the High Court in injunctive, business protection and bonus dispute litigation.
She is particularly sought after in challenging appellate and test case litigation, having acted in Court of Appeal litigation on four occasions and on seven occasions in the EAT in precedent setting litigation which has shaped employment law.
Outside of Chambers Georgina enjoys surfing, tennis, skiing, cycling, guitar, photography and mixology. She also has a love of live music, festivals and travel.
Highlights over the last 12 months include:
- Acting led by Edward Kemp KC in the DIFC Courts in David Lee Rapp and Prime Energy Markets FZCO v Ahria Esphandiar Roushanbakhti and Axis Limited, CFI-017-2026, for the Individual Defendant and the new employer of a departing employee in relation to alleged breach of non-compete, non-solicitation, non-dealing and confidentiality covenants, misuse of confidential information in employment and alleged shareholder agreements and unlawful inducement claims. Assisted in successfully defeating an interim injunction [DIFC, Business Protection, Restrictive Covenants, Confidentiality, Unlawful Inducement].
- Acting led by Daniel Tatton-Brown KC in a High Court restrictive covenant, unlawful inducement and confidential information dispute [High Court Employment, Business Protection, Restrictive Covenants].
- Acting led by John Mehrzad KC in two High Court restrictive covenant disputes in the wealth management industry, one of which involved an interesting point of law in relation to the construction of restrictive covenants following a TUPE transfer [High Court Employment, Business Protection, Restrictive Covenants].
- Obtaining permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal led by David Reade KC in Zen Internet v Stobart in relation to the law on warnings in capability dismissals involving senior executives. The case will be of significant interest to those advising on senior executive dismissals following the removal of the statutory cap in January 2027 [Senior Executives, Appellate Advocacy].
- Acting for the successful appellant in Zen Internet v Stobart [2025] EAT 153 setting new legal precedent on the temporal scope of Polkey (led by David Reade KC) [Polkey, Appellate Advocacy].
- Acting for a former Equity Partner in a complex disability discrimination claim arising from demotion from the equity partnership and their subsequent involuntary retirement [LLP’s and Partnership].
- Successfully resisting an application for interim relief in a whistleblowing detriment and dismissal case (unled) [Whistleblowing].
- Appearing for the Claimant working in the fintech sector in a commission and TUPE dispute following a share sale of the employing entities parent company in a case pleaded in excess of 2m and heard over a 5-day trial with Judgment reserved (unled) [Bonus Disputes, TUPE].
- Acting unled for numerous senior executives and employers in the financial services and professional services sectors in whistleblowing and pregnancy/maternity discrimination and family friendly rights claims. [Senior Executives, Whistleblowing, Pregnancy and Maternity Discrimination].