Alexander Halban

Barrister

Joint Head of Commercial and Civil Fraud Group

Call: 2009

Custom PDF

Overview

Alexander practises in all aspects of commercial litigation. His practice covers

  • commercial fraud and asset recovery (including freezing orders and related relief);
  • commercial contract disputes;
  • private international law (including jurisdiction challenges, enforcement of foreign judgments, anti-suit injunctions and cases under foreign law);
  • company and shareholder disputes (including unfair prejudice petitions and M&A disputes); and
  • insolvency and bankruptcy.

Alexander is a fluent Russian speaker and has a particular expertise in Russian and CIS disputes, having appeared in some of the largest Russian disputes including National Bank Trust v Yurov and Gorbachev v Guriev, both listed as ‘Top 20 Cases of the Year’.

Alexander is recommended as a leading commercial practitioner in the major legal directories – he is ranked in Chambers & Partners for Commercial Dispute Resolution, and in Legal 500 for Commercial Litigation, Civil Fraud and Company Law.

Expertise

Commercial Litigation

Alexander represents clients in a wide range of international and domestic commercial disputes in the High Court and international arbitration. Many of his cases have an international element and feature jurisdiction challenges, claims under foreign law and applications for anti-suit injunctions.

  • Matchroom Boxing Ltd v Rakuten Group Inc (2026) acting for an international boxing promoter against a Japanese ticketing and events company for breach of contracts involving the promotion of boxing tournaments in Japan.
  • DMA Resources Ltd v Brazilian Nickel Ltd [2026] EWHC 833 (Ch) acting in a claim for commission by an introducer for the successful introduction of an investment by a private equity in a Brazilian nickel mine.
  • Marples v Secretary of State for Education [2025] EWHC 2794 (Ch) acting (led by Adam Solomon KC) in a £40m claim alleging misfeasance in public office and negligence against a government agency, for preventing the claimants from selling their shareholdings in their company which held a major publicly-funded education contract.
  • Gorbachev v Guriev [2024] EWHC 2174 (Comm), acting (led by Paul Stanley KC and David Scorey KC, for the claimant Russian businessman in a $1bn claim to recover a shareholding in a Russian company listed on the London Stock Exchange, hearing over a six-week Commercial Court trial, including a week sitting in Dubai due to UK sanctions imposed on the defendant. The case was listed as one The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases.
  • Atlas Holdings LLC v Aviator LLC, City Loft LLC and Ugulava (2024), led by Charles Samek KC, in a $330m ICC arbitration relating to the acquisition of an online gambling business in Georgia by a UK gambling group; also obtained a High Court anti-enforcement injunction against defendants seeking to enforce a Georgian judgment which interfered with the arbitration.
  • Alimov v Mirakhmedov [2024] EWHC 3322 (Comm) acting (led by Charles Samek KC) for a Kazakh businessman claiming a share worth $800m in a major cryptocurrency mining company, involving a complex jurisdiction challenge and issues under Kazakh law
  • Re HTL International Ltd (2020-23): advising (with Adam Solomon KC) the judicial managers (administrators) of a Singapore-based international group in relation to a challenge by the company shareholder to the judicial management and an anti-suit injunction to restrain proceedings brought in China which sought to undermine the Singapore court’s judgment.
  • Al-Subaihi v Al-Sanea [2021] EWHC 2609 (Comm) (led by Rupert D’Cruz KC) acting successfully at trial for the Claimants, Saudi lawyers claiming unpaid legal fees of $16 million for representing the former Saudi billionaire, Maan Al-Sanea, his family and his collapsed Saad Group of companies.
  • National Bank Trust v Yurov [2020] EWHC 100 (Comm): acting (led by Paul Stanley KC and Tom Poole KC) in a claim brought by a Russian bank alleging misappropriation of $900 million against its former directors and shareholders, raising complex issues of Russian law. The case was listed as one The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases.
  • Sheianov v Sarner International Ltd [2020] EWHC 1214 (QB), [2020] 1 WLR 3963 successfully obtained summary judgment for delivery up of a collection of Second World War motorcycles held by an exhibition design company, resisting its claim of a lien for its unpaid fees. The judgment, reported in the Weekly Law Reports, features the first detailed modern discussion of the principles of the common law lien.
  • Russian Airline v Seychelles Company (2019): acting for a Russian airline in an LCIA arbitration concerning an attempted corporate raid on the airline by a former joint venture partner, claiming debts of US$180 million.
  • Re Bennet Invest; Hniazdzilau v Vajgel [2016] EWHC 15 (Ch): acting (led by Thomas Roe KC) in a dispute over the beneficial ownership of Belarusian assets held through an English corporate structure and the effects under Russian, Belarusian and English law of illegal transactions.
  • Boots v Goldpine Estates Ltd, CA, 18 June 2014: acting (led by Thomas Roe KC) in a second appeal to the Court of Appeal on agreements for leases ‘subject to contract’.
  • Barber v Rasco International Ltd [2012] EWHC 269 (QB): acting (led by Thomas Roe KC) for claimants in a dispute concerning a partnership to operate an oil and gas pipeline protection contract in Azerbaijan and Georgia, against a defendant seeking to divert the contract away from the partnership.
Civil Fraud

Alexander’s civil fraud practice features complex cross-border fraud and asset tracing cases, cases of fraudulent breach of director’s duty and breach of trust, misappropriation of assets and corporate wrongdoing. Alexander has extensive experience of applications for freezing injunctions, asset disclosure orders, debarring orders against non-compliant defendants and related applications for contempt of court.

  • DBLP Sea Cow Ltd v Steffensen [2026] EWHC 281 (Ch) and [2026] BCC 119 acting (led by Nikki Singla KC and sole counsel at many hearings) for the founder of a NASDAQ-listed AI company to recover shares in the company sold by the defendant in breach of trust; secured a proprietary injunction and asset tracing orders against defendant; debarring orders for non-compliance; and obtain summary judgment for $7m. Now acting in the related application for the defendant’s committal for contempt of court.
  • Up the Gills LLC v Paul Scally Management Consultancy FZE acting (led by Adam Solomon KC) in a claim for fraudulent breach of warranty and fraudulent misrepresentation relating to the acquisition of shares in a football club.
  • Gorbachev v Guriev [2024] EWHC 2174 (Comm), acting (led by Paul Stanley KC and David Scorey KC, for the claimant Russian businessman in a $1bn claim to recover a shareholding in a Russian company listed on the London Stock Exchange, hearing over a six-week Commercial Court trial, including a week sitting in Dubai due to UK sanctions imposed on the defendant. The case was listed as one The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases.
  • Atlas Holdings LLC v Aviator LLC, City Loft LLC and Ugulava (2024), led by Charles Samek KC, in a $330m ICC arbitration alleging fraud in the acquisition of an online gambling business in Georgia by a UK gambling group; also obtained a High Court anti-enforcement injunction against defendants seeking to enforce a Georgian judgment, allegedly obtained by fraud, which interfered with the arbitration.
  • Alimov v Mirakhmedov [2024] EWHC 3322 (Comm) acting (led by Charles Samek KC) for a Kazakh businessman claiming a share worth $800m in a major cryptocurrency mining company, involving a complex jurisdiction challenge and issues under Kazakh law.
  • National Bank Trust v Yurov [2020] EWHC 100 (Comm): acting (led by Paul Stanley KC and Tom Poole KC) in a claim brought by a Russian bank alleging misappropriation of $900 million against its former directors and shareholders, raising complex issues of Russian law. The case was listed as one The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases.
  • Russian Airline v Seychelles Company (2019): acting for a Russian airline in an LCIA arbitration concerning an attempted corporate raid on the airline by a former joint venture partner, claiming debts of US$180 million
  • Lefebvre d’Ovidio v Lefebvre d’Ovidio (2019-21): acting (led by Charles Samek KC) in an application for a freezing order under s. 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in support of Italian proceedings for €750 million concerning the ownership of a major Italian cruise line; and in subsequent proceedings to set aside transactions defrauding creditors in support of the enforcement of Italian judgments
  • Re Friendly Investment Co Ltd & Re Friendly Pensions Ltd (2015-21): acting for the liquidators of a group of pension and investment companies to recover sums fraudulently misappropriated from the pension schemes
  • Re Bennet Invest; Hniazdzilau v Vajgel [2016] EWHC 15 (Ch): acting (led by Thomas Roe KC) in a dispute over the beneficial ownership of Belarusian assets held through an English corporate structure and the effects under Russian, Belarusian and English law of illegal transactions
  • Barber v Rasco International Ltd [2012] EWHC 269 (QB): acting (led by Thomas Roe KC) for claimants in a dispute concerning a partnership to operate an oil and gas pipeline protection contract in Azerbaijan and Georgia against a defendant seeking to divert the contract away from the. partnership
Company law, shareholders’ disputes & insolvency

Alexander acts in company and shareholder’ disputes, including unfair prejudice petitions, claims for breach of director’s duties, share sale and M&A disputes, along with related insolvency disputes.

  • Re Bynx Ltd (2026) defending an unfair prejudice petition in a corporate group based in the UK and Australia, with allegations of unjustified removal of the petitioner from management and cross-allegations against the petitioner of breach of director’s duty and backdating of documents.
  • Up the Gills LLC v Paul Scally Management Consultancy FZE (2026) acting (led by Adam Solomon KC) in a claim for fraudulent breach of warranty and breach of director’s duties relating to the acquisition of shares in a football club.
  • Cambden v Leonard [2026] EWHC 668 (Ch) secured an interim injunction restraining the removal of a founder and director of a company, by the majority shareholders who had been seeking to divert corporate opportunities away from the company.
  • Shareholder A v Shareholders B & C (2023) LCIA arbitration of a shareholder dispute with mutual allegations of breach of a shareholders’ agreement, raising issues of drag-along clauses and share valuation.
  • Re Contingent & Future Technologies Ltd [2023] EWHC 2451 (Ch), [2024] BCC 223, [2024] 2 BCLC 358 acting for a founding shareholder of a technology company for his wrongful removal and classification as a ‘bad leaver’; as sole counsel, resisted a strike out application, against a leading company silk, in a decision reported in both company law reports.
  • Malik v Henley Homes plc [2023] EWCA Civ 726: acting (sole counsel and led by Adam Solomon KC in the Court of Appeal) for a shareholder of a property development company in s recover an outstanding directors’ loan from the company; obtained summary judgment against a defence of an oral agreement, which was upheld by the Court of Appeal.
  • Re Corbin & King Ltd (2022) acting (led by Adam Solomon KC) for the founders of The Wolseley and Delauney restaurants in a dispute against the majority shareholders and investors, in an unfair prejudice petition and administration and moratorium dispute.
  • Re HTL International Ltd (2020-23): advising (with Adam Solomon KC) the judicial managers (administrators) of a Singapore-based international group in relation to a challenge by the company shareholder to the judicial management and an anti-suit injunction to restrain proceedings brought in China which sought to undermine the Singapore court’s judgment.
  • VTB Bank v Laptev [2020] EWHC 321 (Ch): acting (as sole counsel) in bankruptcy proceedings for £25 million brought by a Russian bank against a Russian-domiciled individual who is already in Russian bankruptcy proceedings; successfully secured the dismissal of the petition for lack of jurisdiction and based on expert Russian law.
  • Re Friendly Investment Co Ltd & Re Friendly Pensions Ltd (2015-21): acting for the liquidators of a group of pension and investment companies to recover sums fraudulently misappropriated from the pension schemes.
  • Re Bennet Invest; Hniazdzilau v Vajgel [2016] EWHC 15 (Ch) acting for the defendant (led by Thomas Roe KC) in a dispute over the beneficial ownership of Belarusian assets held through an English corporate structure and the effects under Russian, Belarusian and English law of illegal transactions.
  • Re HLC Environmental Projects [2013] EWHC 2876 (Ch), [2013] BCC 337: acting (led by Thomas Roe KC) for a company director in a misfeasance claim brought by liquidators for unlawful preferences made by the company operating substantial PFI contracts.
  • Sharma v Sharma [2013] EWCA Civ 1287, [2014] BCC 73: acting (led by Richard Snowden KC (now Snowden LJ) and Thomas Roe KC) in a shareholders’ dispute and appeal to the Court of Appeal over the beneficial ownership of a group of companies, with diversion of corporate opportunities and breach of directors’ duties.

What the directories say

  • “Alexander Halban was exceptionally good. He is a very able and very bright junior.” Chambers & Partners 2026
  • “Alexander is a great team player, who is hardworking and gets stuck in with you in the trenches. He is a good, safe pair of hands.” Chambers & Partners 2026
  • “Alexander is a really organised, accurate and friendly junior, who turns things around quickly. He is very responsive and very good at written work. He also benefits from being a Russian speaker.” Chambers & Partners 2026
  • “Alexander is extremely hard working and dedicated. He is personable and a great team player.” Legal 500 2026
  • “Alexander is fantastic on shareholder disputes. He is extremely hard-working and provides great analysis of the legal issues.” Chambers & Partners 2025
  • “Alexander has a remarkable ability to dissect complex legal issues and present them clearly. His advocacy is persuasive and precise, making him highly effective in court.” Legal 500 2025
  • “Supremely quick on his feet, Alexander is an imperturbable junior.” Legal 500 2025
  • “A junior who demonstrates great rapport with clients.” Legal 500 2025
  • “Alexander is very approachable and highly responsive. He shows good attention to detail and has very good drafting skills.” Chambers & Partners 2024
  • “Alexander is a stellar junior. He works equally well on cases on his own right, and also when being led. His quality of work, both written and oral, is first-rate.” Legal 500, Civil Fraud
  • “He is a tactical genius and someone who displays amazing attention to detail.” Chambers & Partners, Commercial Dispute Resolution
  • “Very smart and responsive, he is a rising star of the Bar.” Chambers & Partners, Commercial Dispute Resolution
  • “An incredibly able advocate who quickly and succinctly identifies and deploys the salient points in a very effective and engaging manner which always has the ear of the court.” Legal 500, Commercial Litigation
  • “Incredibly user-friendly, very responsive and someone with excellent attention to detail, he punches above his weight and is a pleasure to work with.” Chambers & Partners, Commercial Dispute Resolution
  • “Alexander has extreme attention to detail and is extremely helpful. He is always willing to take an extra step to offer assistance and guidance, not only to the clients but to solicitors as well.” Legal 500, Commercial Litigation
  • “Alexander is extremely thorough and is always on top of the detail. Alexander combines careful attention to detail with skilful analysis of the commercial reality of the matter to provide the most appropriate advice in all the circumstances.” Legal 500, Civil Fraud
  • “Alexander has extreme attention to detail and is extremely helpful.” Legal 500, Company
  • “Very pragmatic and very commercially minded.” Chambers & Partners, Commercial Dispute Resolution
  • “He cross-examines well, makes strong points and is much in demand as he speaks Russian.” Chambers & Partners, Commercial Dispute Resolution
  • “A real all-rounder – extremely bright and versatile, with excellent drafting skills.” Legal 500, Civil Fraud
  • “Incredibly impressive junior, he has a sense of judgment that exceeds his call, which means he gets to the heart of the issue – Russian language skills are a plus but as an all-round junior, he has been phenomenal.” Legal 500, Commercial Litigation
  • “Bright, produces excellent documents, and has a firm but pleasant courtroom manner, he also has a USP: he speaks fluent Russian, meaning that he is a natural choice for the wave of CIS litigation making its way through the Commercial Court at present.” Legal 500, Civil Fraud

Footer