Grahame Anderson

Barrister

Call: 2013

Custom PDF

Overview

Grahame is an expert employment and sports litigator with particular expertise in complex discrimination cases and High Court business protection disputes. He has appeared for individuals, companies and trade unions in some of the most important recent authorities. Grahame appears, led and unled, in the High Court and Employment Tribunals, as well as the appeal courts and domestic and international arbitral jurisdictions. He is known for being user friendly, personable and a formidable cross-examiner.

Grahame was named one of the Legal 500’s Leading Juniors in both employment law and sports law. He is ranked among Chambers and Partners’ leading junior employment and sports barristers 2026.

 

Expertise

High Court Employment & Business Protection

Grahame regularly appears, led and unled, in High Court business protection cases.

Recent highlights include:

  • Grahame is currently instructed in a major team move case in the glass recycling industry: in Grahame’s clients secured without-notice injunctions at an early stage against 8 defendants and the case continues to trial.
  • Alesco Risk Management Services Ltd and ors v Bishopsgate Insurance Brokers Ltd and ors [2019] EWHC 2839 (QB): acting for the Claimants, led by Gavin Mansfield KC, in this blockbuster High Court team move and confidential information litigation involving leading City insurance brokerages;
  • Visage Limited and anor v Mehan and ors [2017] EWHC 2734 (QB): acting for one of the Defendants led by David Reade KC in a very high value covenants and confidential information case involving major players in the global fashion industry;
  • Acting for the Defendants, led by Gavin Mansfield KC, in a confidentiality and team moves dispute in the insurance brokerage sector.
Statutory Employment

Grahame has acted in a broad range of Tribunal, County Court and High Court employment cases and regularly acts for Claimants, Respondents and unions, including in major authorities.

Recent highlights and reported cases have included:

  • Kocur v Angard Staffing Solutions Limited [2022] EWCA Civ 189; 2022 IRLR 437 (Court of Appeal): Grahame was led by David Reade KC in this important authority on the scope of the agency worker’s right to be informed of job opportunities.
  • CESC v Gould, UKEAT/0330/19/VP:(Employment Appeal Tribunal): Grahame recently appeared unled before Mr. Justice Choudhury in this important appeal on territorial reach. He acts for the former captain of a superyacht in a claim against his former employers, which he seeks to bring before the UK employment tribunal. Grahame was successful at first instance. The dispute has been reported in the national media. The employer’s application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal was refused and Mr Gould eventually secured a costs award.
  • Okedina v Chikale [2019] EWCA Civ 1393; [2019] IRLR 905 (Court of Appeal): led by David Reade KC in this important authority on the effect of illegality on employment contracts. David and Grahame acted for the successful Respondent to the appeal; her former employer had argued that because her continued employment breached immigration rules, it was unenforceable. The Appellant’s application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was refused. Grahame edited the Practical Law UK entry on Illegality in Employment Contracts. The entry is reproduced from Practical Law with the permission of the publishers. For further information visit com.
  • British Council v Jerey; Green v SIG plc [2019] ICR 929 (Court of Appeal); acting for the appellant, Mr Green, in an important appeal, and now leading authority, on the Employment Tribunal’s territorial jurisdiction. Grahame has developed a particular specialism in cases involving thorny questions of territorial jurisdiction, in particular in the maritime context: Grahame acted successfully in Martirano v Peras Limited and Gould v Crew Employment Services Camelot, both cases involving the captains of superyachts and their right to bring claims before the UK tribunal.
  • Bryan v College of Northwest London [2018] UKEAT 0067/18: Grahame acted for the Respondent, having earlier successfully defended the Respondent in a 7-day discrimination claim; the EAT decided that, although the Employment Tribunal had made an error of law, there could only have been one outcome and so the Claimant’s claims against Grahame’s client were dismissed anew.
  • ST v XY Law Firm: acting unled for a leading solicitors’ firm in a highly sensitive disability discrimination claim; the case involved significant reputational risk and Grahame was able to secure anonymisation for all parties;
  • Ghiglieri v Systech [2017] UKEAT 0310/16/BAsuccess in the EAT in a case concerning the test for implying a term through custom and practice and subsequent victory on remittal before the same Tribunal;
  • Kojimav Japan Green Medical Centre Limited: successfully representing a Japanese doctor, based in London, in a claim against his former employer. The case threw up complicated legal issues about illegality,
  • Wraith v Driving Standards Agency [2015] UKEAT 0210/13/JOJ: led by Gavin Mansfield KC in the Court of Appeal and Employment Appeal Tribunal in a long-running case that deals with discrimination law pre-Equality Act, statutory grievance procedures important points about issue estoppel in Employment Tribunals.
Sport

Grahame is Deputy Head of the Littleton Sports Group. He has particular expertise in big ticket commercial litigation in the sports world, especially in FA Rule K Arbitrations (both as counsel and arbitrator); inevitably, this means he often goes head-to-head with some of the industry’s leading KCs. Grahame is a member of Sport Resolutions’ panel of arbitrators and regularly sits as an arbitrator, alone or as a panel, in high value or highly sensitive cases, and is frequently appointed to conduct investigations.

Recent highlights from Grahame’s sports practice have included:

  • Hartlepool United FC v Fulham FC:Grahame, led by Sam Neaman, secured a six-figure sum before the Professional Football Compensation Committee in relation to the acquisition by Fulham of former Hartlepool player Luca Murphy,
  • Isaac v (1) Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Vincent Tan and (2) Cardiff City Football Club (Holdings) Limited[2022] EWHC 322 (Ch): Grahame acts for a minority shareholder in Cardiff City, Mr Isaac, against the majority, the Malaysian billionaire Vincent Tan in this major sporting bust-up. Judgment in Grahame’s client’s unfair prejudice petition is expected imminently.
  • Acting, led by John Mehrzad KC for a major global sports agency against its former MD in FA Rule K arbitration).
  • Conducting an investigation on behalf of the Board of a County FA in relation to allegations against former members.
  • Acting for the former Head Coach of an England Olympic squad in an appeal against the findings of an independent investigation;
  • Acting for a premiership and England star in a claim brought by a former agent; Acting for a major Cypriot agent in CAS agency-player dispute;
  • Acting for a former premiership physio in a claim against his former club;
  • Grahame has acted for a number of the major sports agencies in Rule K litigation against players who have defaulted on contractual obligations in agency mandates;
  • Acting for a rugby player accused of a doping violation;
  • Advising a national youth sport charity on safeguarding issues and drafting their safeguarding disciplinary policy. Grahame acted for a swimmer in a funding selection dispute in the run up to Rio 2016; he was led by Jeremy Lewis.

What the directories say

  • “Grahame Anderson is an excellent barrister who is diligent, analytical, has good courtroom demeanour, and is effective at making persuasive submissions.” Chambers & Partners 2026
  • “Grahame’s technical skill and attention to detail are absolutely forensic. He’s tough with the other side but great with solicitors and clients.” Chambers & Partners 2026
  • “Grahame Anderson is pragmatic, focused, and always clear in his advice to clients.” Chambers & Partners 2026
  • “His cross-examination is forensic, always well-prepared and deployed with panache. His written work is also phenomenal. He is the senior junior barrister you want on your team.” Legal 500 2026
  • “Grahame is an unflappable advocate.” Chambers & Partners 2025
  • “Grahame handles complex and sensitive cases with real skill. He is able to judge perfectly when to be more forceful when the circumstances require it.” Chambers & Partners 2025
  • “He is a clear communicator and an effective cross-examiner. An incredibly talented junior.” Legal 500 2025
  • “Grahame is decisive and clear in his advice and imbues clients with confidence. His written submissions marshal cases into straightforward clarity and he is an effective and persuasive advocate.” Chambers & Partners 2024
  • “Grahame is technically strong on the law, all over the details, and is also commercial. He’s client friendly and a pleasure to work with.” Legal 500 2024
  • “Grahame is a superb cross-examiner and completely on top of the law.” Chambers & Partners 2023
  • “Very hardworking and gets really stuck in with the client. Excellent to work with as part of the lawyer team, and tenacious and analytical.” Legal 500 2023
  • “A barrister you want on your team. Grahame is a very able lawyer who can combine powerful written submissions with equally powerful advocacy.” Legal 500 2023
  • “He far outweighs his level of call with the quality in the work that you get out of him, and he gives a brilliant service.” Chambers & Partners 2022
  • “He is very user-friendly, he gets the heart of the matter, he sticks to his guns and he has a good manner in front of the tribunal.” Chambers & Partners 2022
  • “Obviously very clever, knows his stuff, and really cares about doing a good job. Approachable and responsive, with absolutely no airs and graces, and generous with his time and well prepared for hearings.” Legal 500 2022
  • “Respected advocate who is well versed in discrimination claims, high-value team move litigation, and legally complex cases involving issues such as immigration status.” Chambers & Partners 2021
  • “He’s brilliant at cross-examination and great with clients.” Chambers & Partners 2021

Footer