Extensive experience of unlawful competition and business protection disputes, including confidential information/database rights, enforcing restrictive covenants, springboard relief, diversion of business opportunities and team-moves. Lucy is regularly instructed on urgent injuctions, and appeared for successful appellant in leading case on interim enforcement of non-compete covenants, Planon v. Gilligan [2022] EWCA Civ 624. She has depth of experience in the special features of navigating business protection disputes to trial, including speedy trials.
Featured Cases:
- Acting for IFA firm against competitor firm and ex-employee, where +150 clients taken. Proceeding to 6-day trial in Newcastle BPC in 2027.
- Representing Fintech firm in recovering stolen IP and diverted business opportunities. Obtained extensive injunctive relief including Imaging Orders in January 2026. Proceeding to trial in KBD.
- Sole Counsel in speedy trial raising undecided issues of impact of TUPE on interpretation and enforcement of restrictive covenants. Listed for 4-day trial in KBD in March 2026; settled (against John Mehrzad KC and Georgina Churchhouse).
- Advised shipbroker firm on team move of entire desk to rival firm (spring 2026). Novel arguments about garden leave.
- Acted for Defendants in Tech sector in successfully resisting interim enforcement of non-compete covenants and pre-action disclosure requests.
- Represented food manufacturer faced with a team move and theft of proprietary information. Obtained springboard relief and order for forensic search of computers and devices. Matter settled in Spring 2024 after CCMC in Manchester BPC (sole counsel against Andrew Grantham KC).
- Resisted injunction to enforce minimum notice period against solicitor; Hine LLP v. Jones [2023] EWHC 1708.
- Acted for successful appellant in Planon v. Gilligan [2022] EWCA Civ 624 (Leading James Green). Leading case on enformcemnt of non-competes by injunction. CA considered principles relating to restrictive covenant injunctions, hardship as a defence to enforcement of non-compete, delay and balance of convenience.
- Represented 10 Defendants to injunction to restrain employment at a competitor recruitment firm (unled against Daniel Tatton Brown KC).
- Represented eight defendants on a springboard injunction where a prior preservation of evidence order had been obtained without notice.
- Successfully acted for Defendants in Parker Steel v. Barrett Steel [2019]. Novel argument as to the effect of Reg 4 (7) on enforceability of covenants where employees have objected to transfer.
- Secured an urgent injunction for Insurance Brokers including springboard relief following a team move and conspiracy involving 12 employees and a former director.
- Acted for former employee of PR and Communications firm in defending an injunction to enforce restrictive covenants. The case raised issues as to the basis for and appropriate scope of springboard relief, and the interplay between the necessary pre-action steps and delay.
- Acted for the Claimant media company in the first known injunction to restore control of corporate Linked-In groups and connections; Whitmar v. Gamage Limited [2013] EWHC 1881.

